As you will probably have seen, the Law Commission has now published its long awaited report into the reform of the Law in relation to enfranchisement.
This has been accompanied by two other reports on Right to Manage and the introduction/ reinvigoration of Commonhold.
Further details of each of these can be obtained by looking at the Law Commission’s website. A link to this appears below:-
and summaries are at
The Law Commission’s summary document is easier reading as it runs to 16 pages rather than the 859 pages of the full report. I have also written a short summary note that appears here: see Note
If the majority of these reforms were to be enacted, there are a number of points which would be good news for leaseholders.
Commentary
A very short overview of some of the key points appear below:
- Costs – The proposals suggest a change of emphasis in terms of costs, with tenants not needing to pay the landlord’s costs on enfranchisement.
- Lease extensions –A new right to extend to 990 years, not plus 90 years as is currently the case and a right to buy out the ground rent (only) if your lease is more than 250 years long.
- Collective claims – The threshold for bringing a collective claim would be changed so that there would only be a ban on enfranchisement if 50% of the building was used for non-residential purposes. In addition, there is a requirement to retain their interest in non-participating units (by way of a ‘leaseback’), thereby reducing the overall cost of buying the freehold.
- Valuation – in a separate paper (published earlier this year in January) the Law Commission set out options to reduce the price paid on enfranchisement by adjusting the calculations in favour of the flat owner. These proposals are very political in nature, and hence a ‘range’ of options were presented for consideration by government.
- Flats and Houses treated the same – the proposals are that the same regime would apply to flats and houses and that many more properties that would previously not have qualified as houses to buy their freehold will do so (particularly those with leases of the internal parts only).
All of these proposals are part of the Government’s stated objective of making it “cheaper and easier” for people to buy their freehold or extend their lease.
That said, none of this is yet Law and these proposals from the Law Commission would need to be responded to by Government and, there would need to be sufficient Parliamentary time for these to be turned into Legislation.
The early indications that we have seen indicate that there may be some cross-party support for these proposals. However, as you will be aware, the Government has many other things on its plate at the moment, including the Coronavirus situation and also Brexit. In addition this is just a proposal from the Law Commission which Government have to respond to, but do not actually have to do anything with. History is littered with a number of very good Law Commission reports and recommendations which have not become law.
Will there be reform?
It seems logical to suggest that the answer to this is ‘yes’ but as to when and to what extent remains unclear. What is clear is that these reforms are at least 3-5 years away, if not further and might indeed not happen as mentioned above. This means that if you have a lease that is very short, or one that is approaching a ‘danger point’ in valuation terms such as 80 years, then delay is not an option. Even in other cases, recent market adjustments mean that now is as good a time as any (if not even better than normal) to be thinking about buying your freehold or extending your lease.
If you have any further comments or questions, please get in contact to discuss.
Mark Chick
Leasehold@bishopandsewell.co.uk
For all COVID-19 issues please see ourDigital Newspaper. This has been designed to deliver constant updates on Government policy and how this is impacting personal and business life.